 |
|
| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Santanfara
3460 Posts |
 Posted - 20 Aug 2010 : 19:59:36
|
quote:
Originally posted by kobo
Janyafara welcome back on board! Also thanks for your comments, views and opinion...........
Coalitions or allaince must be done with rerads to size, if not what is the point doing it? It is crazy to even contemplate that. That stance was taken to appease the stiff standpoint of the PDOIS. But in normal cases, such is a backward move. |
Surah- Ar-Rum 30-22
"And among His signs is the creation of heavens and the earth, and the difference of your languages and colours. verily, in that are indeed signs for men of sound knowledge." Qu'ran
www.suntoumana.blogspot.com |
 |
|
|
Santanfara
3460 Posts |
Posted - 20 Aug 2010 : 20:04:01
|
quote:
Originally posted by Moe
Santafara you are acting like a little hood rat Masalaha, Only at the bantaba will you meet foul mouth retired Khalifa's of religion engaged in propaganda. .......
Go away. Go kiss the murderers feet. The man making the whole country suffer this Ramadan is the one you should be worried about. But hey,ya'all are Bananas..
I hope, you are keeping the fast, going by your past. I pray for all the Gambians unlawfully killed, jailed and tortured by the mad man this holy month, may God retribute for them. Ameen. |
Surah- Ar-Rum 30-22
"And among His signs is the creation of heavens and the earth, and the difference of your languages and colours. verily, in that are indeed signs for men of sound knowledge." Qu'ran
www.suntoumana.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
Janyanfara
Tanzania
1350 Posts |
Posted - 20 Aug 2010 : 21:30:58
|
Brother keyjatta and co,
I am doomed with disappointments by your comments about victory for Jammeh come 2011.
Am sure it is only few dead Halifarites in the PDOIS who want that as Gambians cannot affort another five years of Jammeh.May God forbid
If that is the stance of Halifarites like yourself, then why not convince your leader to join ranks with Jammeh come 2011 just like another breakaway NADD member had done?
Now are you sayig there is no way the Gambian people should be given the power to choose a coalition leader?
How about Halifa asking the mandate from the people if he want to lead such a coalition?
I have said it loud and clear that I am not blaming anyone for the failure of NADD.It died and we must move on.
I did only answer to some of your questions and continious blame on Darboe personally for breaking away.
Now you asking me why not blame OJ too?
Why should I? I don't have to cast blames now.I too want the future of our dear mother land as Mr.DBaldeh rightly cried his total sadness about us bigetting eachother over a spilled milk when we should be talking constructive about the future for Gambian opposition.Remember Ousainou and Halifa will go and leave us to care for our people.
I suggest we take the matter to the electorates.That is the only way forward.
Anyone against that is an enemy of progress period.
I did not blame halifa OJ Waa or anyone.It was you guy always trying to raise a dead horse NADD.
Infact I have forgotten the past and am looking forward to the future.
I did raised some points for haters of Ousainou to note.That was why I mentioned names of some other deserters of NADD different from UDP.
You guys am afraid belief in you hearts that majority of Gambian prefer Ousainou's leadership to that of Halife that is why you making too much noise.
Am also sure some of you prefer Jammeh to Ousainou's leadership that is why you would not give democracy a chance by allowing the people to choose.
But as I told you the facts which you have failed to acknowledge. The Gambia people who doesnot want YAYA never blamed Ousainou as you have seen in their power of voice in 2006 and they refused to agree with either PDOIS or you and I have given you the fact by providing you with the breakdown of that election results. .Who are we to waist our time casting blame on someone otherwise?
So who are you to say ya true but because Darboe broke away from NADD, therefore he must pay the price on the alter of a betrayal scale? Say we all pay the price I mean all
I said lets give the Gambian people the chance this time around to choose a leader against Jammeh come 2011. If anyone is chosen by the Gambian people to lead any future coalition, be it any of those in question, I and all should follow to clear us of long imprisonments untracable disappearances constant turture and mass corruption. God bless the voice of the Gambian people!
Amen
quote:
Originally posted by kayjatta
quote:
Originally posted by Janyanfara
Isalute you guys kayjatta, Koba ect, Well I have put my self above unnecessary arguements. Though this present debate is educative to me.....
Darboe the party leader cannot be exonerated from the faults of the party UDP in this case. He was a representative of the party and he signed documents on behalf of the party on the basis that he understood what he was signing. Remember that Darboe is an educated man, a lawyer, therefore he should be held to higher standard of expectation.
There was "a meeting of the minds" because all the participants (signatories) in NADD knew what they were signing. They all knew what the agreement was. You cannot tell me that Darboe, a supposed seasoned attorney, did not know what the agreement was, therefore there was no "meeting of the minds"!
True, contracts can be broken, and defective contracts can even be set aside by a court of law. However, in this case, by deliberately flouting his obligations as a signatory, darboe turned both himself and the UDP into traitors.
Furthermore, the leadership power struggle was not between Darboe and Halifa. It was between Darboe and Omar Jallow. That was where things started to unwind. So your assault on Halifa is out of place! Why don't you attack Omar Jallow, as well?
I am done with this topic. Come 2011, another landslide for Jammeh by the grace of God!
|
Edited by - Janyanfara on 20 Aug 2010 21:43:01 |
|
|
|
Nyarikangbanna
United Kingdom
1382 Posts |
Posted - 20 Aug 2010 : 23:45:58
|
My friend don't be dissappointed. Kayjatta is APRC. He sings the praise of Jammeh just like Every Mbaye of Banjul.
Thanks |
I do not oppose unity but I oppose dumb union. |
Edited by - Nyarikangbanna on 20 Aug 2010 23:49:22 |
|
|
|
kayjatta
2978 Posts |
Posted - 21 Aug 2010 : 07:52:44
|
Janyafara and co, please do not be disappointed yet. Wait until 2011 when Jammeh and APRC wins with a landslide. Will 80% be enough disappointment fr you?
I am not a "Halifarite", I am only a PDOIS supporter. I have told you guys that "we don't believe in personality cults or monarchs" unlike you guys who believe and seek to establish a great "Darboe empire".
A point of correction! Waa Juwara is not a NADD breakaway. He is a UDP breakaway! Guess who else is a UDP breakaway? Hamat Bah!
FYI PDOIS has rejected APRC and Jammeh well before UDP was conceived, so there is no point me telling PDOIS to join with the incumbent.
A part of the process of moving on includes SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT. UDP will do all Gambians a big favor if it swallows its pride ( Big-Party Syndrome)and accept that they are the sole cause of the collapse of NADD.
Halifa and PDOIS must be commended for putting together a blueprint, a road map-Agenda 2011-for the way forward. Again UDP's pride is getting in the way and holding all Gambians at ransom.
Yet UDP has not put forward any alternative road map, except insisting at all cost that everyone must rally behind Darboe...
How can the Gambian people choose the coalition leader without conducting a primary? Halifa is not power-hungry; he is not insisting that he should be the leader o the next president.
I hope you leave me alone now, I don't wanna continue talking a wall. You guys don't understand a thing...
Long live JAMMEH! Long live APRC!
|
|
|
|
Nyarikangbanna
United Kingdom
1382 Posts |
Posted - 21 Aug 2010 : 15:32:18
|
quote:
Originally posted by kayjatta
Long live JAMMEH! Long live APRC!
[quote]Originally posted by Janyanfara
Jajeff wai Every Mbaye. Your loyalty to Chairman Jammeh has never been mistakened but can I say one thing; please do get your facts right. Hamat Bah has never being a member of the UDP. He is the leader of an independent soveriegn party called the National Reconciliation Party since 1996, the same year UDP was formed.
NRP and UDP never went into a merger to form one legal unit. They form a loose alliance in 2006 to fight the 2006/7/8 election cycle and they have done that together standing shoulder to shoulder. It was after the alliance had served it purpose that both parties legitimately revert to their individual party programmes, as was expected, while leaving the possibility of forming another alliance to fight future elections right on the table. They still coordinates some of their activities together and their respective party leaders have a good personal relationship between them. They often visit each other and have lunch together. So it is silly of you to say that Hamat Bah broke away from UDP. He has never being a member of UDP in the first place.
If you choose to continue with this line of misrepresention, I think it would become fairly legitimate for anyone to openly call you a lair in this forum. A word for a wise is always enough.
Regards
|
I do not oppose unity but I oppose dumb union. |
Edited by - Nyarikangbanna on 21 Aug 2010 22:49:19 |
|
|
|
kayjatta
2978 Posts |
Posted - 21 Aug 2010 : 21:22:39
|
Do not put words into my mouth! I didn't say that "Hamat Bah was a member of UDP". Hamat Bah and his NRP were associated an affiliated with UDP and contested the 2006 general elections under one banner. Now Hamat Bah and the NRP have severed that relationship and Mr. Bah himself has declared his party's independence from UDP at the rcently concluded UDP congress. As far as the facts of the UDP/NRP Alliance are concerned, NRP has broken away from UDP. That is undisputable. It is really tedious that I have to break down every single thing for you guys to understand... |
Edited by - kayjatta on 21 Aug 2010 21:57:24 |
|
|
|
Janyanfara
Tanzania
1350 Posts |
Posted - 21 Aug 2010 : 21:42:49
|
Brother Kayjatta,
I will respect your decision to let you out of this topic. But first may I remind you as bro. nyi rightly said Hamat was never UDP. much more Waa left the UDP and formed his own political party ( have you forgotten NDAM?)even before the formation of NADD. So I don't know what you are talking about or maybe you are lost for words.
Maybe you lost so much information on your country that you did not know the latest news.
Ya Jammeh can win by 100% but if you think that affects me or the UDP only, then you must be living in a dream world!
As for Halifa and PAOIS's Blue print on co operational way forward for opposiitions come 2011, this is a welcomed development for the opposition.
UDP is welcoming all suggestions for a way forward from Gambians both at home and abroad and that includes Halifa and PDOIS.
However I must reiterate to you and PDOIS that an opposition alliance for 2011 must be based on a collective draft for all oppositions not an individual party proposal.TRhis shoulfd show you UDP is not out to down grade any lesser opposition.
As we welcome Halifa's idea, we must also assure all within the opposition that UDP's position on an alliance must be based on giving the Gambian people the chance to choose the opposition flag bearer as we don't want other Ousainou haters like your self to cast blame in the future at Ousainou.
I belief any lover of the Gambia would agree to this because it is fairer and more transparent.
Asaalamu Alaika
Ramadan MUBARAK! |
|
|
|
kayjatta
2978 Posts |
Posted - 21 Aug 2010 : 21:59:19
|
As far as the facts are concrned, the only party refusing to submit to a national primary is UDP. I am surprised you didn't know that, Janyafara... |
|
|
|
Nyarikangbanna
United Kingdom
1382 Posts |
Posted - 21 Aug 2010 : 22:43:58
|
quote:
Originally posted by kayjatta
[quote]Originally posted by Nyarikangbanna
[quote]Originally posted by kayjatta
Do not put words into my mouth! I didn't say that "Hamat Bah was a member of UDP". Hamat Bah and his NRP were associated an affiliated with UDP and contested the 2006 general elections under one banner. Now Hamat Bah and the NRP have severed that relationship and Mr. Bah himself has declared his party's independence from UDP at the rcently concluded UDP congress. As far as the facts of the UDP/NRP Alliance are concerned, NRP has broken away from UDP. That is undisputable. It is really tedious that I have to break down every single thing for you guys to understand...
Again you got your facts wrong. Hamat Bah did not server any relations. The alliance was meant to be in place until after the 2008 local government elections when its life span shall expire. It lived that lifespan and naturally fade away as was expected but leaving the possibility of another alliance with a new term of reference right on the table.
I must state again; if you continue misrepresenting facts in this way, it would become legitimate for anyone in future to openly call you a lair.
Regards |
I do not oppose unity but I oppose dumb union. |
Edited by - Nyarikangbanna on 21 Aug 2010 22:46:52 |
|
|
|
kobo
United Kingdom
7765 Posts |
Posted - 22 Aug 2010 : 03:24:29
|
quote:
Originally posted by Santanfara
quote:
Originally posted by kobo
Janyafara welcome back on board! Also thanks for your comments, views and opinion...........
Coalitions or allaince must be done with regards to size, if not what is the point doing it? It is crazy to even contemplate that.That stance was taken to appease the stiff standpoint of the PDOIS. But in normal cases, such is a backward move.
AM NOT MIS-INFORMING BUT PROVIDING UNDENIABLE FACTS
YOUR STATEMENTS ARE SHEER CONTEMPT AND EXPOSES HOW INSINCERE, DECEITFUL, DISINGENUOUS, & TWO-FACED CERTAIN UDP/NRP MILITANTS ARE; ESPECIALLY NEWLY FORM UDP-UK YOU HAVE OPENLY CONTRADICTED LAWYER DARBOE UDP LEADER WITH YOUR IRRESPONSIBLE STATEMENTS
THESE ARE THE DISTORTIONS, MIS-REPRESENTATION, FALSIFICATION & LIES THAT HINDERS EFFORTS FOR ALL OPPOSITION PARTIES TO UNITE
TO PROOF MY POINTS THESE ARE VERBATIM STATEMENTS FROM INTERVIEW OF LAWYER DARBOE/UDP LEADER ;
1. "Mr.Ceesay in 2004, all the parties agreed on the need to form an alliance for opposition parties and this need became more urgent and apparent when the constitution was amended by introducing a simple majority for Presidential elections. Hitherto a Presidential candidate would be declared duly elected if he obtains more than 50% of the votes validly cast at the elections. We all felt it made more sense to have an alliance of opposition parties so that we do not have split votes to the opposition. The UDP was very committed to the idea and because of that we agreed to be at par with all other opposition parties. We agreed to have equal representation and equal voice with even an untested party like NDAM,we agreed to have equal voice and equal representation with a party such as PPP which had a committee only in Serrekunda.We also agreed to be at par with PDOIS which did not even poll more than 5% at the 2001 Presidential elections. I know as a fact that non of the leaders of these parties would have accepted this sort of arrangement if they had the political dominance UDP enjoyed. We conducted all the negotiations on the basis of having an alliance of opposition parties. We did not discuss and agree on the merger of political parties or the creation of new political parties. The opening words of the preamble are “We, the undersigned representatives of opposition political parties, who seeked to establish an alliance…….” Under part one of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) the alliance was established and article one states “an alliance is hereby established. The name of the alliance is National Alliance for Democracy and Development (NADD) with the acronym (NADD).Then article four states amongst other things “all opposition parties who are signatories to this MOU shall be founding members of the alliance. The selection of candidate for the alliance for Presidential, National Assembly and Council elections should be by consensus but if there is an impasse then selection must be by Primary election which will be restricted to party delegates and there would be equal member of delegates comprising a chairman and youth leader of every party from village, ward and constituency."
2. "On the 7 February, I tendered my resignation from NADD the political party and indicated that the UDP was committed to the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2005 and that it would be to the UDP to decide on its continuous membership of the
alliance.The Chairman Mr. Hassan Musa Camara said he was not accepting the resignation letter because he wanted to work on me to reverse my decision. I however promised that I will withhold the copies of my resignation to the press and IEC, which I did".Below is the excerpt of the interview…... More from http://www.gambia.dk/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=8286
PLEASE RE-VISIT ALSO Discourse With Halifa Sallah http://www.gambia.dk/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=8329
ALL YOUR COMMENTS ARE BASELESS! CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE SOMETHING ON RECORD, INTERVIEWS, OFFICIAL, PUBLIC OR PRESS RELEASE FROM LAWYER DARBOE AS UDP LEADER OR UDP DECLARING OR MAINTAINING THAT ANY FORM OF NEGOTIATION WITH OTHER OPPOSITION PARTIES, ITS POSITION IS CLEARLY OR UNCOMPROMISINGLY A PARTY-LED COALITION/ALLIANCE |
Edited by - kobo on 22 Aug 2010 04:17:06 |
|
|
|
kobo
United Kingdom
7765 Posts |
Posted - 22 Aug 2010 : 03:40:42
|
quote:
Originally posted by terangba
There you have it. The UDP supporters are saying no to primaries and brought valid points, i.e. there is no documented history of opposing parties holding a primary.
The only question left is: Will PDOIS accept a party lead coalition?
If PDOIS says no to a party lead coalition then there is no need for arguing, let us all vote for APRC.
YOU SAID UDP SUPPORTERS BUT NOT UDP; LEADERSHIP OR EXECUTIVE MANY UDP SUPPORTERS ARE JUST CYBER MILITANTS AND CANNOT MOBILISED ANY SUPPORT FOR UDP TO WIN GENERAL ELECTIONS
IF THEY FELT AND HAVE A RESOLUTION TO THAT EFFECT, THERE IS THE NEED FOR LAWYER DARBOE AS UDP LEADER OR UDP BE BOLD TO MAKE A PUBLIC DECLARATION THAT UDP CAN ONLY WORK WITH OTHER OPPOSITION PARTIES ON A PARTY-LED COALITION/ALLIANCE
"UDP PARTY-LED COALITION/ALLIANCE" AM YET TO HEAR AN ANNOUNCEMENT TO THAT EFFECT
YOU ALSO STATED; "The only question left is: Will PDOIS accept a party lead coalition?"
TO HELP EXPRESS MY OPINION ON THIS QUESTION. YOU HAVE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE FACT THAT PDOIS ARE MATURE TO EXERCISE THEIR POLITICAL RIGHTS AND TAKE THE BEST STRATEGIC POLITICAL RESOLUTIONS AT ANY GIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES AND THEY ARE OPEN TO DIALOGUE WITH ANY POLITICAL PARTY TO PROMOTE GOOD GOVERNANCE.
PLEASE RE-VISIT THESE STATEMENTS AND FORM YOUR OWN VERDICT;
1. PDOIS MADE GENUINE EFFORTS & ISSUE A PUBLIC NOTICE;
"PDOIS wrote to UDP before its Congress to indicate to them that the party was waiting for the resolution of the UDP Congress on inter party unity in order to know what form of Alliance could be forged for 2011. " FROM RELATED Bantaba Gambian politics topic PDOIS Press Release after the UDP congress under http://www.gambia.dk/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=9341
2. Also Halifa was questioned;"It is believed that in politics what matters is number, so why political heads like your humble self opted for NADD candidacy when UDP leader should be nominated as suggested by others?"
HE RESPONDED; "I had no interest in becoming a presidential candidate. I have been with Sidia for years and he stood as presidential Candidate. I had no interest in being coordinator. If I had my own free will I would not have accepted to be coordinator of an alliance. I accepted to be a coordinator because I felt that duty has called on me to do so. I accepted to be a Presidential candidate because I do not run away from responsibilities when they are unanimously entrusted. For your information one must distinguish two phases of NADD’s process of nominating a presidential candidate, that is, the phase before the UDP leader resigned from NADD and the phase after he resigned from NADD. Before the resignation of the UDP leader he had the option to recommend for the holding of a primary where numbers would have counted and Halifa Sallah may never have been part of that contest."
More from Discourse With Halifa Sallah under http://www.gambia.dk/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=8329
|
Edited by - kobo on 22 Aug 2010 04:20:04 |
|
|
|
kayjatta
2978 Posts |
Posted - 22 Aug 2010 : 05:56:01
|
| Good job Kobo!!! And good job Madiss (Madiba) for your ealier post!!! |
Edited by - kayjatta on 22 Aug 2010 05:57:47 |
|
|
|
Janyanfara
Tanzania
1350 Posts |
Posted - 22 Aug 2010 : 20:17:23
|
Brother kobo
you think you guys can fool Gambians by fabrications? Why have'nt you conpleted the document? Look below I complete Ousainou's verson for you.!
.......These are some of the most important provisions in the MOU, what we have opted to do by MOU is to set up an alliance of opposition parties. Obviously the criteria set for the selection of candidates could be met only by the UDP. PDOIS did not have the following to meet the criteria, nor did the PPP or NRP.It was only UDP that had the capacity and following to meet this criteria. It is common knowledge that the MOU was signed in 2005.At that ceremony something happened which would have aborted the signing ceremony. The UDP delegation comprising me and my deputy Mr.Yahya Jallow went to that ceremony to sign the MOU on behalf of UDP and make a statement that is appropriate on such occasions. Before the commencement of the ceremony I was given a document virtually an oath declaring commitment.OJ told me he was seeing it for the first time and I was going to either walk out or refuse to sign the declaration. But there were four gentlemen in the assembly, Mr. Sam Johns,Dr.SJ Pama,Alagie Ba Trawalley and Dr.Sheriff Ceesay to whom I deferred because I have enormous respect for these people and I think it would be out of place for me not to conform with this unexpected development. NonThis development to me showed insincerity and a lack of openness on the part of whoever might have drafted that declaration and brought it to the ceremony without consulting my party. Nonetheless UDP remain committed to the MOU. After the signing of the MOU some members of the alliance conscious of UDP’s dominance came to the conclusion that if a Presidential candidate were to be selected under the MOU, the UDP being the dominant opposition political party would produce a candidate and they did not want to support a candidate running in the name of UDP.So they flouted and the discussion to register NADD as a political party really took at least three months. In fact I presented a scenario to them if the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) were to invite me to a meeting as leader of UDP while I am also a member of NADD,a registered political party and an issue arises between UDP and NADD which one will I support. I continuously advised them against the registration of NADD as a political party. During one of the meetings when I came very hard in my arguments one of the party leaders walked out of the meeting called some people in the United States to say that Darboe and UDP are creating obstacles for us. And before we left the meeting it was on the Freedom Newspaper, and me and my party are being portrayed as anti-united opposition when infact the anti-united opposition are those who refused to accept the reality of the fact that the MOU signed did not call for the establishment of a new political party. And I remember, I think it was on the 16 April 2005,I said since you are insisting go and register it. When the constitution of NADD, the political party, was presented by Managing editor of Foroyaa Newspaper Sam Sarr to the IEC for registration he reported he was asked certain questions. This made the Chairman Mr.Hassan Musa Camara to ask Sam Sarr to go and withdraw the document he submitted at the IEC for registration but it was too late.
Now who are the real betrayers of the poor Gambians? You see my dear brother the human being is a developing being and there is nothing one can do under the carpet that would not come to light.You guys had agendas against Ousainou and UDP. You know in the long run it would be more better for UDP to form an aliance to get rid of Jammeh under whose government, UDP militants suffered all sorts of abuse. So I don't understand why just few individuals would try confuse many.The deligation was meant to comprise of only two representatives from each party. But did you know PDOIS was changing their representation between Sedia sam and halifa while the rest had only two permanent delegates. Who was fooling who?.
Be aware mr. kobo be aware!
|
|
|
|
kobo
United Kingdom
7765 Posts |
Posted - 23 Aug 2010 : 14:38:55
|
Janyafara I HAVE NOT FABRICATED ANYTHING BUT ADDRESSING CERTAIN STATEMENTS POINT BY POINT OBSERVED FROM YOU AND OTHER UDP CYBER MILITANTS TO EXPOSED THE FACTS, DISTORTIONS AND MIS-REPRESENTATIONS
I HAVE PASTED THE LINK FOR FULL INTERVIEW OF LAWYER DARBOE AND READERSHIP CAN RE-VISIT TO FORM THEIR OWN VERDICT
I HAVEN'T FINISH YET ON YOUR STATEMENTS AND WILL COMMENT ON ANY POINT RAISED TO EXPOSED THE FACTS
YOU SAID WOU WERE THERE AND KNEW A LOT ABOUT NADD & SAVE THE GAMBIA DEMOCRACY PROJECT (stgdp), SO PLEASE INFORM US OR GIVE US YOUR OWN VIEWS/OPINION;
1. WHETHER NADD WAS A PARTY LED-COALITION OR WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A PARTY-LED COALITION
2. IF NADD WAS A PARTY-LED COALITION HOW WAS IT GOING TO REGISTER CONSTITUTIONALLY, BEARING IN MIND IT CANNOT BE UNDER ANY OPPOSITION PARTY BANNER OR NAME? FOR THAT OPPOSTION COALITION/ALLIANCE CANNOT BE CONSIDERED A UDP PARTY, NRP PARTY, PDOIS PARTY OR ANY PARTY UNDER SIGNATORIES OF THE MOU
3. IF YOU STILL INSIST ON A PARTY-LED COALITION PLEASE PROPOSE A FORMAT ON HOW THEY ARE GOING TO WORK CONSTITUTIONALLY BETTER THAN NADD MOU
4. ANY WEAKNESS ON THE MOU SIGNED BY ALL OPPOSITION PARTIES
5. WHAT DID LAWYER DARBOE STATE OR DECLARE IN HIS/UDP RESIGNATION LETTER FROM NADD REMEMBER FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION THERE ARE TWO VERSIONS ON RECORD UNDER DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES
a. A RESIGNATION LETTER TENDERED IN 2006.
b. 2009 INTERVIEW FOR LAWYER DARBOE. |
Edited by - kobo on 24 Aug 2010 00:40:08 |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
| Bantaba in Cyberspace |
© 2005-2024 Nijii |
|
|
|
Topic Locked
