 |
|
Author |
Topic  |
|
turk

USA
3356 Posts |
Posted - 28 Jun 2010 : 21:20:47
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_mortality_rate
Gambia's Infant mortality rate (deaths/1,000 live births) : 74.2 Under-five mortality rate (deaths/1,000 live births) : 128.2
Considering Gambia's population 1,705,000 with 2.60 approx 45,000 birth. Meaning that means every year 3339 babies die. 5769 children under 5 dies.
If Gambia jumps only one country in the list of the countries, which is Tanzania.
Infant mortality rate (deaths/1,000 live births) : 72.6 Under-five mortality rate (deaths/1,000 live births) : 118.4 That means every year 3267 babies die. 5328 children under 5 dies.
That means very small improvement will save 72 babies, 441 under 5 each year.
What is causality of death due to political oppression in Gambia?
If Gambia was at Singapore level, there would be only 135 death for babies and 164 death for child under 5.
|
diaspora! Too many Chiefs and Very Few Indians.
Halifa Salah: PDOIS is however realistic. It is fully aware that the Gambian voters are yet to reach a level of political consciousness that they rely on to vote on the basis of Principles, policies and programmes and practices. |
Edited by - turk on 28 Jun 2010 21:24:26 |
|
Janko
Gambia
1267 Posts |
Posted - 28 Jun 2010 : 23:22:31
|
Demography - Gambia 1983 - 2006f

|
Clean your house before pointing a finger ... Never be moved by delirious Well-wishers in their ecstasy |
 |
|
turk

USA
3356 Posts |
Posted - 28 Jun 2010 : 23:38:40
|
I think my population figure (from wiki) is more recent, that is why different. Growth rate is 2.6, it is about same. |
diaspora! Too many Chiefs and Very Few Indians.
Halifa Salah: PDOIS is however realistic. It is fully aware that the Gambian voters are yet to reach a level of political consciousness that they rely on to vote on the basis of Principles, policies and programmes and practices. |
 |
|
Janko
Gambia
1267 Posts |
Posted - 29 Jun 2010 : 00:04:37
|
turk,
is from: Government Web Portal of the Republic of The Gambia 20100628 Its not Janko´s ... |
Clean your house before pointing a finger ... Never be moved by delirious Well-wishers in their ecstasy |
Edited by - Janko on 29 Jun 2010 00:05:53 |
 |
|
mansasulu

997 Posts |
Posted - 29 Jun 2010 : 16:58:39
|
I would think it is down to more than one factor responsibility. For me, poverty and missplaced prioritization are more of a causality than political oppression. We are a poor country and if you are a poor country you find it hard to meet some of your basic needs, like health care. In other words, there are more politically repressive governments ranking higher than the Gambia on that list. At the same time, there are countries that are richer in terms of resources than the Gambia who rank lower than us. So its a combination of sorts as to the reasons why mortality rates are higher in the Gambia. |
"...Verily, in the remembrance of Allâh do hearts find rest..." Sura Al-Rad (Chapter 13, Verse 28)
...Gambian by birth, Muslim by the grace of Allah... |
 |
|
turk

USA
3356 Posts |
Posted - 29 Jun 2010 : 17:21:45
|
quote: poverty and missplaced prioritization are more of a causality
Mansa
I think so. Combination of reasons from the lack of health spending due to lack of GDP per capita, to lack of health care know-how/education. My motivation for this post to highlight the prioritization of the problems/focus by Gambians. For example, South Korea, China, Malaysia, Chile, Turkey many countries priortize the development that has more impact the citizens' life than 'full democracy'. Turkey was under one party democracy until 1950s from 1920. Are they full democracy? No. But they have made lots of progress in terms of development since their war against British, France, Russia and Arabs, they have more realistic chance to establish better government system. If there is no strong capitalist class, capital, human capital resource and liberal economy, then, in my opinion, Gambia needs more planned economy and stability may be more important than liberal/democracy in the country. Democracy may bring instability, imagine a coaltion government for Gambia where no critical decisions could be made? Instead of Gambia modeling themselves for rich western democracies, they should look at the east Malaysia, South Korea, Thailand, Turkey, Singapore, Taiwan, Chile...... Besides east is rising and west is falling. Also, western success in economics has a lot to do with colonization (free natural resources)/slavery (free labour) which caused tremendous impact on their industrialization. Democracy is not the sole reason for west to seem successful in government system. It is wealth which were generated from outside resources. I just think, Malaysia, Korea etc are better model for Gambia than Swiss, UK, Sweden etc. Or its own unique model.
Korea
quote: The first direct election was also held in 1948. Although South Korea experienced a series of military dictatorships since the 1960s up until the 1980s, it has since developed into a successful liberal democracy. Today, the CIA World Factbook describes South Korea's democracy as a "fully functioning modern democracy".
South Korea's real gross national product expanded by an average of more than 8 percent per year, from US$3.3 billion in 1962 to US$204 billion in 1989, breaking the trillion dollar mark in 2007. Per capita annual income grew from US$87 in 1962 to US$4,830 in 1989, reaching the $20,000 milestone in 2007. The manufacturing sector grew from 14.3 percent of the GNP in 1962 to 30.3 percent in 1987. Commodity trade volume rose from US$480 million in 1962 to a projected US$127.9 billion in 1990. The ratio of domestic savings to GNP grew from 3.3 percent in 1962 to 35.8 percent in 1989. The most significant factor in rapid industrialization was the adoption of an outward-looking strategy in the early 1960s. This strategy was particularly well suited to that time because of South Korea's poor natural resource endowment, low savings rate, and tiny domestic market. The strategy promoted economic growth through labor-intensive manufactured exports, in which South Korea could develop a competitive advantage. Government initiatives played an important role in this process. The inflow of foreign capital was greatly encouraged to supplement the shortage of domestic savings. These efforts enabled South Korea to achieve rapid growth in exports and subsequent increases in income. By emphasizing the industrial sector, Seoul's export-oriented development strategy left the rural sector relatively underdeveloped. Except for mining, most industries were located in the urban areas of the northwest and southeast. Heavy industries generally were located in the south of the country. Factories in Seoul contributed over 25 percent of all manufacturing value-added in 1978; taken together with factories in surrounding Kyonggi Province, factories in the Seoul area produced 46 percent of all manufacturing that year. Factories in Seoul and Kyonggi Province employed 48 percent of the nation's 2.1 million factory workers. Increasing income disparity between the industrial and agricultural sectors became a serious problem by the 1970s and remained a problem, despite government efforts to raise farm income and improve rural living standards.
|
diaspora! Too many Chiefs and Very Few Indians.
Halifa Salah: PDOIS is however realistic. It is fully aware that the Gambian voters are yet to reach a level of political consciousness that they rely on to vote on the basis of Principles, policies and programmes and practices. |
Edited by - turk on 29 Jun 2010 17:37:46 |
 |
|
turk

USA
3356 Posts |
Posted - 06 Jul 2010 : 02:39:35
|
Go east |
diaspora! Too many Chiefs and Very Few Indians.
Halifa Salah: PDOIS is however realistic. It is fully aware that the Gambian voters are yet to reach a level of political consciousness that they rely on to vote on the basis of Principles, policies and programmes and practices. |
 |
|
|
Topic  |
|
|
|
Bantaba in Cyberspace |
© 2005-2024 Nijii |
 |
|
|