Bantaba in Cyberspace
Bantaba in Cyberspace
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ | Invite a friend
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Politics Forum
 Politics: Gambian politics
 Forfeiture of bail recognizance
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

toubab1020



12314 Posts

Posted - 19 Jan 2015 :  18:41:49  Show Profile Send toubab1020 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The Magistrate has taken into account the efforts made by the sureties and given his ruling,the Gambia is advancing into the 21st Century and culture changes must accompany such advancement this in some cases will be painful for friendships,you should ALWAYS understand any action or promise that you are thinking of undertaking and weigh up in your own mind if this is the course of action that you SHOULD take,if you fail to take EXPERT advice prior to making your decision that can be foolish.

========================================================================

Sureties to forfeit bail bond
africa » gambia
Monday, January 19, 2015
[if gte mso 9]> Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE Magistrate Tabally of the Kanifing Magistrates’ Court, on 15 January 2015 ordered one Modou Lamin Ndow and Musa Louis Bahoum to forfeit a bail bond of D100,000 each, for standing as sureties for one Omar Bah, who absconded.

In his ruling, Magistrate Tabally stated that an application was made by Sergeant 3560 Colley for forfeiture of the bail bond executed by the sureties in favour of the accused, Omar Bah.

The prosecutor argued that since the accused jumped bail and the sureties had failed to produce him, the bail recognizance executed by the sureties in favour of the accused ought to be settled.

The prosecutor also submitted that the application was made based on section 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The first surety testified that he did not aid the accused in absconding the jurisdiction, and had made a series of efforts searching for the accused by travelling the length and breadth of the country, but without success.

The first surety said he had travelled to Senegal and Guinea Bissau, all in search of the accused and all efforts to locate the accused person proved futile.

The second surety, Magistrate Tabally went on, said he too tried to locate the accused, without success.

The second surety further told the court that he travelled to Dakar to find the accused.

The second surety indicated that he was informed by an uncle that he (the uncle) remitted the sum of D15,000 to the accused in Niger, where he was last heard from.

This was part of an effort to entice the accused to return and face the pending case, but he failed to return.

Lawyer M.F. Mbai, who was representing the first surety, submitted that the court has discretion to remit a portion of the bail sum.

Lawyer Mbai reminded the court that the sum of D1,000,000 which was part of the alleged sum in the charge sheet was still with the bank.

Lawyer Mbai, therefore, urged the court to remit part of the sum for the recognizance only.

Magistrate Tabally then stated that as a general rule, forfeiture of bail recognizance was at the discretion of the court.

He further adduced that the court took judicial notice of the fact that the sureties rarely received independent legal advice, as they would when entering into similar obligations in a civil context.

On the other hand, he said, the diligence of the surety was only one factor relevant to a forfeiture hearing.

In the end, the court must attempt to balance various considerations in exercising its discretion, adding that he was inclined to the view that the sureties did not appreciate the full implications of the recognizance in question, and their failure to fulfill the undertaking of producing the accused could be mitigated.

He further stated that, in his view, the circumstances of the matter dictated that the bail bond be forfeited in part.

He subsequently ordered that the sureties pay the sum of D100,000 each and in the following order: The sum of D50,000 to be paid on or before the 31 January 2015, and the balance thereafter monthly installments of D10,000 effective the 28 February 2015, and until the balance of the whole amount is fully liquidated.

They were granted bail in the sum of D100,000 each with a Gambia surety who should swear to an affidavit of means.
EndFragment
Author: Dawda Faye

http://thepoint.gm/africa/gambia/article/sureties-to-forfeit-bail-bond

"Simple is good" & I strongly dislike politics. You cannot defend the indefensible.
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Bantaba in Cyberspace © 2005-2024 Nijii Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.09 seconds. User Policy, Privacy & Disclaimer | Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06